Dismantling myths and lies surrounding Operation Sindoor: India’s resolute counter-terrorism triumph

In response, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, 2025, a precision counter-terrorism initiative targeting nine terrorist hubs in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). This article lays bare the facts of the operation, exposes Pakistan’s disinformation campaign, and highlights India’s strategic achievements while dismantling the myths rooted in ideological deceit.

Operation Sindoor: Facts and Strategic Achievements

Operation Sindoor was a meticulously planned tri-service operation executed by the Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force between May 6 and 7, 2025. The operation targeted nine terrorist facilities linked to JeM, LeT, and Hizbul Mujahideen, including key sites like Markaz Subhan Allah in Bahawalpur and Syedna Bilal Camp in Muzaffarabad. According to the Ministry of Defence, the strikes were “focused, measured, and non-escalatory,” deliberately avoiding Pakistani military installations to prevent broader conflict.

Key Achievements

1. 1. Neutralisation of Terrorist Infrastructure: India destroyed multiple terror camps, killing hundreds of terrorists, including top operatives of JeM and LeT. This disrupted their ability to plan and execute cross-border attacks.
   2. Precision and Restraint: The operation utilised advanced platforms like Rafale jets, Sukhoi-30MKIs, BrahMos missiles, Scalp cruise missiles, and Hammer precision-guided munitions, showcasing India’s technological prowess. No civilian infrastructure or Pakistani military facilities were targeted, underscoring India’s commitment to ethical warfare.
   3. Global Messaging: The operation sent a clear message to terror sponsors: India’s zero-tolerance policy against terrorism is backed by decisive action. It also exposed Pakistan’s complicity, as government officials attended terrorists’ funerals, contradicting their denials of involvement.
   4. Strengthened National Resolve: The operation, named “Sindoor” (symbolising the vermilion mark of married Hindu women), was a poignant response to the Pahalgam massacre, where terrorists targeted civilians, including women. It resonated deeply with families like that of Navy officer Vinay Narwal, killed in the attack, who saw it as justice served.
   5. Shifted Deterrence Doctrine: Operation Sindoor redefined India’s war doctrine, equating acts of terror with acts of war, ensuring swift and proportionate retaliation. It demonstrated India’s superior intelligence on enemy locations, enabling precise strikes deep inside hostile territory.

Strategically, Operation Sindoor shifted the deterrence doctrine in South Asia, demonstrating India’s ability to strike deep inside hostile territory with minimal warning. It also highlighted the Indian armed forces’ seamless coordination and operational readiness, reinforcing India’s emergence as a no-nonsense, self-reliant power.

Pakistan’s Disinformation Campaign: Lies and Deceit

In the wake of Operation Sindoor, Pakistan unleashed a coordinated disinformation campaign to deflect blame, sow confusion, and portray itself as a victim. This campaign, propagated through state-backed media, social media, and officials, was rooted in a long-standing ideology of lies, deceit, and the misuse of religion to maintain power.

Key False Claims by Pakistan:

1. 1. Indian Jets Downed: Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir and other handles claimed Pakistan shot down six Indian aircraft, escalating from an initial claim of two. These claims were debunked by India’s Press Information Bureau (PIB), which revealed the images used were from a 2024 MiG crash in Rajasthan.
   2. Attacks on Indian Cities: Pakistan falsely alleged Indian forces fired missiles at their own cities of Amritsar, Jaipur, and Srinagar airports, and even claimed strikes on Afghanistan and Iran. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri called these “ludicrous” and “frivolous,” noting Pakistan’s history of targeting Afghan civilians.
   3. Civilian Casualties: Pakistani media, including Express News, HUM News, and SAMAA TV, emphasised “civilian casualties” without distinguishing between terrorists and civilians. They omitted that the targeted sites were designated terror facilities, not civilian zones.
   4. Video Game Footage: Pro-Pakistan accounts circulated manipulated videos, including footage from video games and sectarian clashes in 2024, falsely claiming they depicted Pakistani strikes on Indian bases like Akhnoor and Bathinda. PIB Fact Check swiftly debunked these as old or unrelated content.

Mechanics of Disinformation

Pakistan’s campaign relied on:

1. 1. State-Backed Media: Channels like Dawn News denied Pakistan’s role in terrorism, while PTV fabricated stories of the destruction of Indian bases.
   2. Social Media Amplification: Handles spread fake videos and images, such as a doctored photo of a Sukhoi Su-30MKI crash from 2014, claiming it was shot down in Muzaffarabad.
   3. Religious Narratives: Pakistan’s rhetoric often cloaked its defence of terrorists in religious terms, portraying strikes on terror camps as attacks on civilians or mosques to incite communal unrest.

This disinformation was not merely reactive but a strategic tool in asymmetric warfare, designed to obscure Pakistan’s military weaknesses and terrorist affiliations. The presence of Pakistani officials at terrorists’ funerals further exposed their duplicity.

Post-Cessation Deceptions

Following intense diplomatic intervention by the United States on May 9, 2025, both nations agreed to a temporary cessation of fire to prevent further escalation. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio facilitated talks with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Pakistani counterparts, urging de-escalation to avoid a broader regional conflict. However, Pakistan violated this agreement within hours, launching drone attacks on May 9 in Jammu and Kashmir’s Naushera sector, which were neutralised by Indian air defences. In a brazen display of deceit, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addressed his nation on May 10, falsely claiming a “decisive victory” over India, asserting that Pakistan had downed multiple Indian jets and repelled Indian aggression.

This speech, broadcast on PTV, was a calculated move to mislead the Pakistani populace, masking their military’s failures and the destruction of their terror infrastructure. Such actions exemplify Pakistan’s reliance on falsehoods to maintain domestic support, further eroding its credibility.

Exposing China’s and Turkey’s Military Failures

Operation Sindoor also laid bare the ineffectiveness of Pakistan’s foreign-supplied military hardware, particularly from China and Turkey, undermining their claims of superiority.

China’s Air Defence Systems: Pakistan’s reliance on Chinese systems like the HQ-9 and LY-80 failed to intercept India’s precision strikes. The BrahMos missiles’ supersonic speed and low-altitude flight paths overwhelmed these systems, exposing their inferiority against advanced Indian munitions.

Turkey’s Drones: Pakistan deployed Turkish Asisguard Songar drones in retaliatory attacks on May 8–9, 2025, targeting Indian cities. India’s air defence systems, led by the S-400, neutralised over 50 drones, rendering them ineffective. This highlighted the gap between Turkey’s hyped drone technology and India’s robust countermeasures.

These failures embarrassed Pakistan’s allies, who have long marketed their systems as cutting-edge, while reinforcing India’s technological edge and self-reliance in defence manufacturing.

The Ideology of Lies and Abrahamic Narratives

Pakistan’s disinformation campaign stems from an ideology that prioritises power over truth, often weaponising religion to justify terrorism and maintain control. This aligns with what some describe as an “Abrahamic” approach, where narratives are manipulated to serve personal or political agendas, sidelining evidence and accountability. Their denial of terror links whilst Pakistani officials attended the funerals of terrorists, and their use of religious rhetoric to deflect criticism, exemplify this deceit.

In contrast, India’s response was grounded in transparency, evidence, and restraint. The Ministry of Defence and PIB provided verifiable data, satellite imagery, and videos to counter Pakistan’s lies, while officers like Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh briefed the world with clarity and professionalism. This approach reflects India’s Dharmic values, emphasising truth, duty, and justice over propaganda.

New India: Self-Reliant, Empowered, and Unapologetic

Operation Sindoor showcased the rise of a New India—confident, self-reliant, and rooted in science, technology, and inclusivity. Key facets include:

Self-Reliance in Defence: The operation prominently featured indigenous systems like the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile and the Akash air defence system, developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). The Akash system, with its 25–45 km range and ability to neutralise drones, jets, and cruise missiles, played a critical role in intercepting over 50 Pakistani drones during retaliatory strikes on May 8–9, 2025. Its phased array Rajendra radar and real-time multi-sensor processing enabled simultaneous engagement of multiple targets, demonstrating India’s technological edge. Reports from Indian defence sources highlight Akash’s 96% indigenous content, reducing reliance on foreign suppliers and marking a milestone in self-reliant defence manufacturing. 

While Israel’s Iron Dome is renowned for intercepting short-range rockets (up to 70 km), Akash’s versatility against diverse threats, including fighter jets and cruise missiles, has been noted as superior in multi-target scenarios. Israeli defence analysts, such as Lt Col Jonathan Conricus, have acknowledged Akash’s “impressive multi-target engagement” during exercises like Iron Fist 2016, where it outperformed expectations against simulated drone swarms, a capability Iron Dome is less optimised for due to its focus on rocket interception.

Women Empowerment: The operation was led in public briefings by two women officers—Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh—whose professionalism and expertise symbolised India’s commitment to gender equality and meritocracy. Their articulate presentations of Operation Sindoor’s precision strikes countered stereotypes, inspiring millions and showcasing India’s inclusive military leadership. Their roles underscored the growing presence of women in high-stakes defence operations, reflecting a societal shift towards empowerment.

Technological Prowess: Beyond BrahMos and Akash, Operation Sindoor utilised advanced platforms like Rafale jets and S-400 systems, integrated with indigenous command and control networks. The Akash system’s success in neutralising Pakistani drones highlighted its edge over foreign systems like the Israeli SPYDER, which India has phased out at forward air bases in favour of Akash due to its mobility and cost-effectiveness. This technological sovereignty positions India as a global defence exporter, with countries like Armenia and Vietnam procuring Akash systems.

Dharmic Resolve: The codename “Sindoor” was a powerful tribute to the women whose lives were shattered in Pahalgam. It underscored India’s cultural ethos of protecting the vulnerable and delivering justice without apology.

Global Strategic Posture: Operation Sindoor signalled India’s assertive stance on the world stage, with its zero-tolerance policy against terrorism backed by precise, evidence-based operations. The operation’s success, coupled with India’s diplomatic clarity in exposing Pakistan’s disinformation, reinforces India’s role as a responsible power.

This New India is unafraid to confront terrorism head-on, supported by a united populace, cutting-edge technology, and a government prioritising national security and scientific progress. The Akash system’s proven superiority in dynamic combat scenarios, as recognised by global defence experts, underscores India’s ascent as a self-reliant, empowered, and unapologetic nation.

The Cost to Terrorism Sponsors

The Pahalgam massacre, where terrorists “wiped off the Sindoor” of innocent women, was a heinous act that galvanised India’s response. The enemy—Pakistan’s terror ecosystem—paid an unprecedented price, suffering military, strategic, and reputational losses that will reverberate for years:

• • Loss of Terrorist Leadership: Key operatives of JeM and LeT, including masterminds linked to the Pulwama attack (2019) and other atrocities, were eliminated, decapitating their command structures.
  • Destruction of Terror Infrastructure: India destroyed 24 terror hubs across Pakistan and PoK, including launchpads, training camps, and radicalisation centres. This crippled their ability to orchestrate attacks, forcing a complete overhaul of their operational framework.
  • Mass Neutralisation of Terrorists: Hundreds of terrorists were killed, with initial estimates suggesting over 100 fatalities, significantly depleting their ranks and disrupting recruitment pipelines.
  • Neutralisation of Aerial Threats: India’s S-400 air defence systems and advanced interceptors destroyed all incoming Pakistani aerial threats, including over 300 Turkish-made drones and missiles, showcasing India’s impenetrable defence capabilities.
  • Destruction of Air Bases: Nine Pakistani air bases, used to support terrorist logistics, were targeted and destroyed, severely hampering their air operations and exposing their vulnerability.
  • Downing of Pakistani Jets: India reportedly shot down Pakistani jets, including J-10CE fighters, during retaliatory strikes on May 8–9, 2025. While official confirmation is pending, debris and intelligence reports corroborate these losses, marking a significant blow to Pakistan’s air force.
  • Minimal Indian Casualties: India sustained minimal casualties, with only a few civilian and military losses due to Pakistani shelling, demonstrating the operation’s precision and India’s robust defensive posture.
  • Changed War Doctrine: Operation Sindoor codified a new doctrine: acts of terror are equivalent to acts of war, warranting immediate and overwhelming retaliation. This shift ensures that sponsors of terrorism face disproportionate consequences.
  • Superior Intelligence: India’s precise strikes were enabled by superior intelligence on enemy locations, leveraging advanced surveillance and human intelligence to pinpoint terror hubs with unparalleled accuracy.
  • Suspension of Indus Waters Treaty (IWT): India suspended its participation in the IWT, a strategic move to pressure Pakistan economically and geopolitically, signalling that terror sponsorship will incur multifaceted costs.
  • Global Exposure and Isolation: Pakistan’s complicity was laid bare, with international figures like Nikki Haley affirming India’s right to retaliate. The presence of Pakistani officials at the funerals of terrorists, and their failed disinformation campaign, further eroded their global credibility, isolating them diplomatically.

The cost of targeting India’s civilians was not just military but reputational, as Pakistan’s lies crumbled under scrutiny.

Western Media’s Folly

Western media outlets, often swayed by Pakistan’s victim narrative, have repeatedly failed to scrutinise its claims. Reports citing “civilian casualties”, or amplifying Pakistan’s denials without verifying India’s evidence, reflect a bias rooted in geopolitical agendas, or a simplistic acceptance of “Abrahamic” narratives that prioritise power dynamics over truth. For instance, CNN’s coverage of Pakistan’s “credible intelligence” claims before Operation Sindoor lacked critical analysis, ignoring Pakistan’s history of disinformation.

This credulity undermines global counter-terrorism efforts and emboldens states like Pakistan to shield terrorists. Western media must prioritise evidence, such as India’s satellite imagery and official briefings, over Pakistan’s unverified assertions.

Steps for the Indian Diaspora

The Indian diaspora and people of Indian origin must play a proactive role in countering disinformation and protecting their communities through practical, actionable steps;

1. 1. Fact-Check and Share Truth: Verify information using official sources like the Ministry of Defence, PIB, and All India Radio. Share fact-checked content to counter fake videos and posts on platforms like X.
   2. Educate the Next Generation: Teach children about India’s history, Dharmic values, and the reality of terrorism to inoculate them against divisive narratives.
   3. Engage Local Media: Write op-eds, participate in discussions, and meet with journalists to present India’s perspective and expose Pakistan’s lies.
   4. Build Community Resilience: Organise forums to discuss security, cultural identity, and the importance of unity in countering disinformation.
   5. Leverage Technology: Use social media analytics and AI tools to track and debunk fake content, collaborating with organisations like PIB Fact Check.

Conclusion

Operation Sindoor was a triumph of precision, resolve, and truth over terrorism and deceit. India’s strategic gains—neutralising terror hubs, exposing Pakistan’s complicity, and showcasing self-reliance—mark a turning point in its counter-terrorism strategy. Pakistan’s disinformation campaign, rooted in an ideology of lies and religious manipulation, collapsed under the weight of evidence and India’s transparency. The failure of Chinese and Turkish systems further underscored India’s technological superiority.

The Western media’s willingness to entertain Pakistan’s falsehoods reflects a broader failure to prioritise evidence over narrative. The Indian diaspora must lead the charge in shattering these myths, using truth as their weapon to protect their communities and uphold India’s honour. Operation Sindoor is not just a military victory but a clarion call for a New India—unapologetic, empowered, and committed to justice.